Former Member, Agriculture Committee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Armed Services Committee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Human Resources Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities and Risk Management, United States House of Representatives
Former Chair, Subcommittee on Nutrition, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Tactical Air and Land Forces Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Veterans' Affairs Committee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Agriculture Committee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Armed Services Committee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Human Resources Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities and Risk Management, United States House of Representatives
Former Chair, Subcommittee on Nutrition, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection Forces, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Tactical Air and Land Forces Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Former Member, Veterans' Affairs Committee, United States House of Representatives
Ranking Member, Committee on Ethics
Member, Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis
Member, Subcommittee on Oversight (Ways and Means)
Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Worker & Family Support
Member, Ways and Means Committee
— Father's Occupation:
— Mother's Occupation:
Spouse's Occupation:
Teacher, Mishawaka Schools
1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-life
1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- No
2. Do you support expanding federal funding to support entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Unknown Position
Do you support the protection of government officials, including law enforcement officers, from personal liability in civil lawsuits concerning alleged misconduct?
- Unknown Position
Do you support increasing defense spending?
- Yes
1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Yes
2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Yes
3. Do you support providing financial relief to businesses AND/OR corporations negatively impacted by the state of national emergency for COVID-19?
- Yes
1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- No
1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, geo-thermal)?
- Yes
2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- No
1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- No
1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- Yes
2. Do you support requiring businesses to provide paid medical leave during public health crises, such as COVID-19?
- Yes
1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- Yes
2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- Unknown Position
1. Should the United States use military force to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a weapon of mass destruction (for example: nuclear, biological, chemical)?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support reducing military intervention in Middle East conflicts?
- Unknown Position
Do you generally support removing barriers to international trade (for example: tariffs, quotas, etc.)?
- Yes
1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-life
1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- No
2. In order to balance the budget, do you support reducing defense spending?
- No
1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- No
2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Yes
1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- No
1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, thermal)?
- Yes
2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- No
1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- No
1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- Yes
1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- Yes
2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- Yes
Do you support the legalization of marijuana for recreational purposes?
- Unknown Position
1. Should the United States use military force in order to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a nuclear weapon?
- Yes
2. Do you support increased American intervention in Middle Eastern conflicts beyond air support?
- Yes
Latest Action: House - 06/14/2019 Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
Tracker:Latest Action: Senate - 06/13/2019 Passed Senate without amendment by Voice Vote.
Tracker:Latest Action: House - 06/12/2019 Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.
Tracker:For generations, our nation's public lands have been treasured sources of respite, enjoyment, and beauty available to every American. The great outdoors also plays a critical role in our economy, with the $778 billion outdoor recreation industry supporting 5.2 million American jobs. In northern Indiana, we know that better than most: 80 percent of the nation's RVs are produced here. It's why Elkhart, which I represent in Congress, is proud to be known as the "RV Capital of the World." As Americans continue to face the unprecedented public health and economic crisis of the coronavirus pandemic, the need for recreation, beauty, and economic growth has never been clearer. Congress is ready to meet the moment with bipartisan legislation that I hope will soon reach the president's desk. Next week, the House will consider the Great American Outdoors Act, which recently passed the Senate. This legislation will support RV manufacturers and workers, promote conservation, and revitalize our national parks -- such as the Indiana Dunes, which last year became Indiana's first national park. By investing in long-delayed maintenance projects, the bill will modernize aging infrastructure across our public lands. By permanently funding the Land and Water Conservation Fund, it will protect our nation's most precious natural resources. And by enhancing access to our nation's public lands, the Great American Outdoors Act will further drive outdoor tourism and recreation, boosting this vital industry and supporting the jobs of countless hardworking Americans. As co-chair of the bipartisan House RV Caucus, I've worked with my colleagues to move this historic bill forward, and I'm grateful to the RV Industry Association for being a key partner in this effort. I look forward to voting for this bipartisan bill that will protect the great outdoors, support RV manufacturers and workers, and ensure our national parks can be enjoyed by all Americans for generations to come.
By: Jackie Walorski Second District Hoosiers are builders and growers. We make RVs, boats, trailers, engine parts, and cutting-edge medical devices. We grow corn and soybeans and raise hogs, ducks and dairy cows. Our manufacturers and farmers keep America on the move, put food on our tables and sell goods all over the world. Trade is vital to Indiana's economy, especially when it comes to our two largest export markets, Canada and Mexico. That's why Hoosiers need a strong, modern trade agreement with our North American trading partners. Last year, the United States, Mexico, and Canada came together to improve and update the North American Free Trade Agreement for the 21st century. The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, or USMCA, will drive job creation, increase exports, and keep America's economic momentum going. Now Congress simply needs to take a vote. You might not remember where you were in 1994, when NAFTA took effect, but you know times have changed. The world's economy has grown more complex. Technology has advanced beyond anyone's wildest dreams. Businesses and workers have adapted -- but NAFTA has not. President Trump recognized this and followed through on his promise to modernize NAFTA. He and his administration worked tirelessly with Mexico and Canada to craft an agreement built for the future, not the past. USMCA will bring a host of benefits for Hoosier small businesses, manufacturers, farmers, and workers. The independent, nonpartisan U.S. International Trade Commission estimates it will lead to 178,000 new jobs and generate over $68 billion in economic growth. The auto industry alone could add $34 billion in new manufacturing investment and create 76,000 American jobs. Hoosier farmers will be able to sell more of the commodities they already export to Mexico and Canada -- including soybeans, corn, and pork produced here in Indiana's 2nd District. And USMCA dismantles trade barriers that have prevented farmers from exporting goods like dairy, poultry, and eggs. Manufacturers will benefit, too. While most of the tariffs on exports to Mexico and Canada have already been eliminated, customs issues and shipping delays at the border still cause headaches. USMCA will help streamline customs procedures, reduce inefficiencies, and get American products to market faster. USMCA will also modernize digital trade. Millions of jobs depend on e-commerce, with worldwide sales totaling more than $29 trillion. However, these are nowhere to be found in NAFTA. That's why USMCA's new digital trade chapter sets a global standard so companies of all sizes can compete fairly. Finally, USMCA will level the playing field for Hoosier workers. I agree with my Democratic colleagues who say Mexico's labor policies have given workers there an unfair advantage over hardworking Americans. Too many Hoosier jobs have been lost as a result of these policies, and it's time to set things right. That's exactly what USMCA does, with pro-worker provisions like requiring Mexico to overhaul its labor system. Mexico's president has already signed reforms into law, and if Mexico or Canada fail to live up to their obligations, the U.S. can file a legal challenge to enforce compliance -- something we couldn't do under NAFTA. USMCA promises historic gains for Hoosier manufacturers, farmers, workers, and consumers. Our economy is booming after tax cuts and regulatory reforms, and USMCA will spur further growth. Workers are seeing bigger paychecks, and USMCA will drive wages even higher. Jobs and manufacturing are coming back to America, and USMCA will accelerate this resurgence. However, these benefits are locked up until Congress approves USMCA, and any delay in doing so will put our economic momentum at risk. I hope Republicans and Democrats will come together soon to finalize this modernized trade deal for the hardworking Hoosiers in Indiana's 2nd District, and for farmers, manufacturers, workers, and families across the country. There is bipartisan agreement that it's time to modernize NAFTA, and it's clear USMCA achieves that goal. Speaker Nancy Pelosi should bring it to the House floor for a vote without delay.
Congress convened a joint session on January 6-7, 2021, to count electoral votes by state and confirm the results of the 2020 presidential election. Walorski voted against certifying the electoral votes from Arizona and Pennsylvania. The House rejected both objections by a vote of 121-303 for Arizona and 138-282 for Pennsylvania.