John Larson
DTo be claimed
John Larson (Democrat) is the representative from Connecticut's 1st Congressional District in the U.S. House.
Larson was first elected to the House in 1998. He was most recently re-elected in 2018. In addition to running as a Democratic Party candidate, Larson also ran with the Working Families Party through cross-filing.
Larson previously served as the Chair of the Democratic Caucus of the House. He has also served on the House Ways and Means Committee and the Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Based on analysis of multiple outside rankings, Larson is an average Democratic member of Congress, meaning he will vote with the Democratic Party on the majority of bills.
Below is an abbreviated outline of Larson's academic, professional, and political career:
Member, Democratic Steering Committee
Co-Chair, Digital Divide Caucus
Former Member, Ethics Committee, United States House of Representatives
Former Chair, Minority Caucus, United States House of Representatives
Member, Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Caucus
Founder, Tactical Air Caucus
Former Member, Tax Policy Subcommittee, United States House of Representatives
Co-Chair, Congressional Joint Strike Fighter Caucus, 2013
Member, Subcommittee on Select Revenue Measures
Chair, Subcommittee on Social Security
Member, Ways and Means
Astrological Sign:
Cancer
— Father's Name:
— Father's Occupation:
— Mother's Name:
— Mother's Occupation:
1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-choice
1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- Yes
2. Do you support expanding federal funding to support entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare?
- Yes
1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Yes
Do you support the protection of government officials, including law enforcement officers, from personal liability in civil lawsuits concerning alleged misconduct?
- No
Do you support increasing defense spending?
- Yes
1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Yes
2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- No
3. Do you support providing financial relief to businesses AND/OR corporations negatively impacted by the state of national emergency for COVID-19?
- Yes
1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- Yes
1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, geo-thermal)?
- Yes
2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Yes
1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- Yes
1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- No
2. Do you support requiring businesses to provide paid medical leave during public health crises, such as COVID-19?
- Yes
1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- No
2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- No
1. Should the United States use military force to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a weapon of mass destruction (for example: nuclear, biological, chemical)?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support reducing military intervention in Middle East conflicts?
- Yes
Do you generally support removing barriers to international trade (for example: tariffs, quotas, etc.)?
- Yes
1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-choice
1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- Yes
2. In order to balance the budget, do you support reducing defense spending?
- Unknown Position
1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Yes
1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Yes
2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- No
1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- Yes
1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, thermal)?
- Yes
2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Yes
1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- Yes
1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- No
1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- No
2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- No
Do you support the legalization of marijuana for recreational purposes?
- Unknown Position
1. Should the United States use military force in order to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a nuclear weapon?
- Unknown Position
2. Do you support increased American intervention in Middle Eastern conflicts beyond air support?
- No
Latest Action: House - 06/18/2019 Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.
Tracker:Latest Action: House - 06/14/2019 Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Tracker:Latest Action: House - 06/13/2019 Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Tracker:
Incumbent John Larson (D) defeated Jennifer Nye (R) and Tom McCormick (G) in the general election for U.S. House Connecticut District 1 on November 6, 2018.
Candidate |
% |
Votes |
||
✔ |
|
John Larson (D) |
63.9
|
175,087 |
|
Jennifer Nye (R) |
35.0
|
96,024 | |
|
Tom McCormick (G) |
1.1
|
3,029 |
|
Total votes: 274,140 |
The primary elections were canceled.
The primary elections were canceled.
rated this race as safely Democratic. Incumbent John Larson (D) defeated Matthew Corey (R) and Mike DeRosa (G) in the general election on November 8, 2016. No candidate faced a primary election in August. Larson won re-election in the November 8 election.<
U.S. House, Connecticut District 1 General Election, 2016 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
Democratic | John Larson Incumbent | 64.1% | 200,686 | |
Republican | Matthew Corey | 33.8% | 105,674 | |
Green | Mike DeRosa | 2.1% | 6,563 | |
N/A | Write-in | 0% | 2 | |
Total Votes | 312,925 | |||
Source: Connecticut Secretary of State |
The following issues were listed on Larson's campaign website. For a full list of campaign themes, .
“ |
|
” |
—John Larson's campaign website, http://larsonforcongress.org/issues/ |
Larson won re-election to the U.S. House in 2014. He ran unopposed in the Democratic primary election on August 12, 2014. He defeated Matthew Corey (R) and Jeffery Russell (G) in the general election on November 4, 2014.
U.S. House, Connecticut District 1 General Election, 2014 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
Democratic | John Larson Incumbent | 61.4% | 135,825 | |
Republican | Matthew Corey | 37.1% | 82,056 | |
Green | Jeffery Russell | 1.6% | 3,447 | |
Total Votes | 221,328 | |||
Source: Connecticut Secretary of the State |
|
Larson won the 2012 election for the U.S. House, representing Connecticut's 1st District. Larson ran unopposed in the Democratic primary August 14, 2012,. He defeated Mike McDonald (R) and S. Michael DeRosa (G) in the general election on November 6, 2012.
U.S. House, Connecticut District 1 General Election, 2012 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Party | Candidate | Vote % | Votes | |
Democratic | John B. Larson Incumbent | 69.7% | 206,973 | |
Republican | John Henry Decker | 27.7% | 82,321 | |
Green | S. Michael DeRosa | 1.8% | 5,477 | |
Independent | Matthew Corey | 0.8% | 2,290 | |
Total Votes | 297,061 | |||
Source: Connecticut Secretary of State "Official Election Results, 2012 General Election" |
2010 On November 2, 2010, John B. Larson won re-election to the United States House. He defeated Ann Brickley (R), Kenneth J. Krayeske (Green), Christopher J. Hutchinson (Socialist Action) and Daniel J. Stephanek (Independent) in the general election.
2008 On November 4, 2008, John B. Larson won re-election to the United States House. He defeated Joe Visconti (Republican), Stephen E.D. Fournier (Green Party) and Matthew Coleman (Write-in) in the general election.
2006 On November 7, 2006, John B. Larson won re-election to the United States House. He defeated Scott MacLean (Republican) and Stephen Fournier (Write-in) in the general election.
2004 On November 2, 2004, John B. Larson won re-election to the United States House. He defeated John Halstead (Republican) in the general election.
2002 On November 5, 2002, John B. Larson won re-election to the United States House. He defeated Phil Steele (Republican), Miriam J. Masullo (Write-in) and Max F. Welch (Write-in) in the general election.
2000 On November 7, 2000, John B. Larson won re-election to the United States House. He defeated Bob Backlund (Republican) in the general election.
1998 On November 3, 1998, John B. Larson won election to the United States House. He defeated Kevin O'Connor (R) and Jay E. Palmieri IV (Term Limits) in the general election.
|
By John B Larson Social Security is our nation's No. 1 financial security and anti-poverty program. Over its 85 years it has never missed a payment and has been the foundation for Americans' retirement. As the country continues to fight the ever-worsening coronavirus pandemic and having elected a new president and Congress, the urgent need to protect and expand Social Security benefits must be addressed. Sixty four million Americans currently receive benefits and 178 million workers are paying into Social Security with each and every paycheck, expecting that Social Security will be there when they need it. As President-elect Biden has said, Social Security is a sacred obligation that Congress must uphold. Some say we can't afford to protect and expand Social Security now, during a global pandemic. However, those most harmed by the pandemic -- the elderly, people of color, and especially women of color -- are the same ones who rely on Social Security the most, and they desperately need a temporary emergency benefit increase. As chairman of the Social Security Subcommittee and co-chair of the Expand Social Security Caucus, I will again introduce an emergency bill to increase benefits for Social Security recipients during the pandemic and to fix an anomaly which will cut benefits significantly for those born in 1960, who are retiring in 2022, if Congress does not act. This anomaly is due to the sudden drop in wages caused by COVID-19, which affects the formula the Social Security Administration uses to calculate benefits. We will also reintroduce a revised version of the Security 2100 Act in the 117th Congress, to improve benefits and ensure solvency for at least 75 years. We will again reach out to the Republicans, seeking their constructive support, in the hope that they will join us in aiding those most impacted by this virus. We are glad that President-elect Biden campaigned on both protecting and expanding Social Security and has called it a "sacred trust." We look forward to working with the Biden administration, honoring that sacred trust, and incorporating his ideas into the Social Security 2100 Act. Let's be clear: COVID-19 further exposed the disparities that already existed before the pandemic. As John Lewis pointed out, Social Security is also a civil rights issue and an economic development issue that is critical to women, millennials and veterans. According to leading economists, enhancing Social Security will help stimulate the economy. In 2014, Social Security benefits contributed $1.6 trillion to the national economy. People don't hoard these benefits, they spend them and put the money right back into their local communities. This is a stimulus we need during this pandemic! This should be an issue that brings us together. The virus doesn't attack your political affiliation; whether you're Democrat or Republican, the pandemic affects us all. We need to unite and fight back. More than 100 organizations support the Social Security 2100 Act including Social Security Works, the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, NAACP, National Organization for Women, and Latinos for a Secure Retirement. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget has also commended the bill. We can -- and we must -- ensure Social Security's solvency without cutting benefits or raising the retirement age. We have to act now to ensure American's No. 1 economic security program is strengthened and secured for future generations. No one gets wealthy on Social Security. It's the nation's lifeline and an earned benefit that provides only about $18,000 a year to an average retiree. 10,000 baby boomers a day become eligible for Social Security. But Congress hasn't acted to strengthen the program in 37 years. Five million of our fellow Americans have paid into the program but receive a payment that's below the poverty level. Members of Congress should ask themselves, could they live on that? This is in our hands and it is on our watch. Congress needs to act. Larson represents the 1st District of Connecticut and is chairman of the Social Security Subcommittee and co-chair of the Expand Social Security Caucus.
Today marks Social Security's 85th anniversary. For 85 years, it has provided millions of Americans with peace of mind that they will have support in their retirement. It has never missed a payment. However, Social Security is now under assault. The Trump administration and Republicans have hatched an ill-advised plan that would defund Social Security, jeopardizing the nation's most popular program at the very time that Americans need these benefits most.Last weekend, the Trump Administration made it clear they want to defund Social Security by pulling the plug on the dedicated funding source for this earned benefit. They plan on moving forward by first deferring payroll taxes and then, even more alarming, have indicated they want to make these cuts permanent.As the president stated, "I plan to forgive these taxes and make permanent cuts to the payroll tax. So I'm going to make them all permanent." This is a direct assault on Social Security.Trump's payroll tax order is a terrible way to get relief to beleaguered Americans. It is stealing from their retirement to make up for the administration's failure to contain the virus and save our economy. Americans need help but not this way. Americans make these payroll tax deposits, officially known as FICA payments, with each paycheck in exchange for guaranteed benefits. FICA stands for the Federal Insurance Contribution Act -- whose contribution? Yours!Trump's plan to defund Social Security is the latest salvo in Republicans' decades long goal to cut Social Security. For decades, Republicans have tried to cut Social Security by trying to privatize it or making cuts through commissions which subvert the legislative process, or propose seemingly reasonable policies such as raising the retirement age, which in fact cause benefit cuts. Now they're trying to use the pandemic as a scapegoat.200+ House Democrats and I have a solution to safe-guard Social Security and make it sustainable for future generations with the Social Security 2100 Act. We've also introduced an emergency relief bill, the Social Security COVID Correction and Equity Act, which would prevent a benefit cut from occurring during the pandemic. It expands benefits to help beneficiaries through these difficult times, which will help boost the economy. No one is getting rich off Social Security. The average benefit is $1,400 per month and that's money that goes directly back into the economy to pay for food, housing, and other necessities.Republicans on the other hand have fought our efforts. Their approach this Congress has been to do nothing. Doing nothing would result in a 20 percent benefit cut after 2035. For the average beneficiary, that's $280 a month! Even more alarming, is a recent report from the Center for American Progress that found if Trump's payroll tax cut became permanent, the Social Security Trust Fund would be exhausted by 2025 and result in benefit cuts of up to 50 percent. President Roosevelt's intention when he designed Social Security was to purposefully make it an earned benefit that people contributed into with every paycheck. By eliminating Social Security's funding source, President Trump is turning it into a welfare program, something Roosevelt warned against.In the midst of the worst economic recession of our time, it is just plain cruel to try and pull the floor out from under Americans' retirement. For two-thirds of Social Security beneficiaries, Social Security makes up the majority of their retirement income. As 401(k)s fluctuate, Social Security remains strong. It has never missed a payment. Unless the Republicans have their way.As chairman of the House Ways and Means Social Security Subcommittee, it's my job to educate the public and serve as a guardian of the program.We will not allow Trump and his Republicans to defund Social Security and cause the demise of the only program guaranteeing financial security for Americans.
Wed 6:30 PM – 7:30 PM CDT
Tue 12:30 PM – 1:30 PM EDT
Tue 6:00 PM – 7:30 PM EST
Manchester Community College Manchester, CT