Share on WeChat
https://www.powervoter.us:443/katie_porter
Copy the link and open WeChat to share.
 Share on WeChat
Copy the link and open WeChat to share.
 Share on WeChat
Scan QRCode using WeChat,and then click the icon at the top-right corner of your screen.
 Share on WeChat
Scan QRCode using WeChat,and then click the icon at the top-right corner of your screen.
Quick Facts
Personal Details

Caucuses/Former Committees

Former Member, Committee on Financial Services, United States House of Representatives

Former Member, Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Financial Institutions, United States House of Representatives

Former Member, Subcommittee on Investor Protection, Entrepreneurship and Capital Markets, United States House of Representatives

Education

  • JD, Harvard University, 2001
  • BA, American Studies, Yale University, 1992-1996

Professional Experience

  • JD, Harvard University, 2001
  • BA, American Studies, Yale University, 1992-1996
  • Former Clerk, Honorable Richard S. Arnold, United States Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit
  • Former Law Practitioner, Stoel Rivers Limited Liability Partnership
  • Professor of Law, University of California at Irvine, 2011-2018
  • California Monitor, Office of the Attorney General, California Department of Justice, 2012-2014
  • Visiting Professor of Law, Harvard University, 2010-2011
  • Professor, University of Iowa College of Law, 2010-2011
  • Associate Professor, University of Iowa, 2005-2010
  • Visiting Professor, William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 2004-2005

Political Experience

  • JD, Harvard University, 2001
  • BA, American Studies, Yale University, 1992-1996
  • Former Clerk, Honorable Richard S. Arnold, United States Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit
  • Former Law Practitioner, Stoel Rivers Limited Liability Partnership
  • Professor of Law, University of California at Irvine, 2011-2018
  • California Monitor, Office of the Attorney General, California Department of Justice, 2012-2014
  • Visiting Professor of Law, Harvard University, 2010-2011
  • Professor, University of Iowa College of Law, 2010-2011
  • Associate Professor, University of Iowa, 2005-2010
  • Visiting Professor, William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 2004-2005
  • Representative, United States House of Representatives, California, District 45, 2019-present
  • Candidate, United States House of Representatives, California, District 45, 2018, 2020

Current Legislative Committees

Member, Committee on Oversight and Reform

Member, Natural Resources Committee

Member, Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy

Member, Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources

Member, Subcommittee on Government Operations

Member, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands

Chair, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations (Natural Resources)

Religious, Civic, and other Memberships

  • JD, Harvard University, 2001
  • BA, American Studies, Yale University, 1992-1996
  • Former Clerk, Honorable Richard S. Arnold, United States Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit
  • Former Law Practitioner, Stoel Rivers Limited Liability Partnership
  • Professor of Law, University of California at Irvine, 2011-2018
  • California Monitor, Office of the Attorney General, California Department of Justice, 2012-2014
  • Visiting Professor of Law, Harvard University, 2010-2011
  • Professor, University of Iowa College of Law, 2010-2011
  • Associate Professor, University of Iowa, 2005-2010
  • Visiting Professor, William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 2004-2005
  • Representative, United States House of Representatives, California, District 45, 2019-present
  • Candidate, United States House of Representatives, California, District 45, 2018, 2020
  • Former Notes Editor, Harvard Women's Law Journal

Other Info

— Awards:

  • Action Award, 2013, College of Law Practice Management
  • Champion of Consumer Rights, 2012, National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys

— Publications:

  • "Modern Consumer Law"

Policy Positions

2021

Abortion

1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-choice

Budget

1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- Yes

2. Do you support expanding federal funding to support entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare?
- Yes

Campaign Finance

1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Yes

Crime

Do you support the protection of government officials, including law enforcement officers, from personal liability in civil lawsuits concerning alleged misconduct?
- No

Defense

Do you support increasing defense spending?
- No

Economy

1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Yes

2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- No

3. Do you support providing financial relief to businesses AND/OR corporations negatively impacted by the state of national emergency for COVID-19?
- Yes

Education

1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- Yes

Energy and Environment

1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, geo-thermal)?
- Yes

2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Yes

Guns

1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- Yes

Health Care

1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- No

2. Do you support requiring businesses to provide paid medical leave during public health crises, such as COVID-19?
- Yes

Immigration

1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- No

2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- No

National Security

1. Should the United States use military force to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a weapon of mass destruction (for example: nuclear, biological, chemical)?
- Unknown Position

2. Do you support reducing military intervention in Middle East conflicts?
- Unknown Position

Trade

Do you generally support removing barriers to international trade (for example: tariffs, quotas, etc.)?
- Yes

2019

Abortion

1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-choice

Budget

1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- Yes

2. In order to balance the budget, do you support reducing defense spending?
- Unknown Position

Campaign Finance

1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Yes

Economy

1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Unknown Position

2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- No

Education

1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- Yes

Energy & Environment

1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, thermal)?
- Yes

2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Yes

Guns

1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- Yes

Health Care

1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- No

Immigration

1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- No

2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- No

Marijuana

Do you support the legalization of marijuana for recreational purposes?
- Unknown Position

National Security

1. Should the United States use military force in order to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a nuclear weapon?
- Unknown Position

2. Do you support increased American intervention in Middle Eastern conflicts beyond air support?
- Unknown Position

Congress Bills
Endorsements
U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D)
U.S. Rep. Robert Garcia (D)
State Sen. Catherine Blakespear (D)
Speeches
Articles

Billboard - Reps. Pascrell and Porter: Ticketmaster Needs to Do More to Refund Fans

May 13, 2020

By Rep. Bill Pascrell, Jr. and Rep. Katie Porter The coronavirus pandemic has indefinitely postponed nearly all concerts, sports games, and large group gatherings. Thousands of Americans who purchased tickets for these events are now in a financial limbo: unable to attend and simultaneously unable to secure a refund because of anti-consumer policies at the country's largest ticket sales company: Ticketmaster. The consequences of coronavirus are widespread, causing unbearable economic hardships. At least 26 million working Americans have filed for unemployment assistance, small businesses are shuttered, and lines at food banks evoke images of black-and-white, Depression-era breadlines. This national emergency demands an all-hands-on-deck response -- and not only from elected officials. Congress has moved swiftly to provide checks directly to families and small businesses to help them stay afloat, but we know that these programs are not enough. The coming months will present brutal financial decisions for many Americans. Faced with these dire choices, millions of Americans were puzzled by the refusal of Ticketmaster to offer refunds. A New York Times investigation showed that as the pandemic forced strong public health guidelines, Ticketmaster stealthily altered the refund policy on its webpage, removing a guarantee that fans could receive a refund for any postponed events. When we learned of this policy change, we wrote to executives from Ticketmaster, and its parent company, Live Nation, and demanded an explanation. We called on them to stop refusing refunds and to revert to their longstanding policy. Ticketmaster's characterized the changes to its refund policy as merely providing "clarity" and also pointed the finger at others, saying that its failure to give consumers their money back was the fault of individual event organizers. Given the company's unchallenged power over the live events market, these claims insulted Americans' intelligence -- and we told Ticketmaster executives just that. The former CEO of Ticketmaster's parent Live Nation, Irving Azoff, is one of the most influential figures in entertainment. He scoffed at our objections to the bad behavior by the behemoth that he helped create, labeling complaints about refunds as shameful. A decade ago, Ticketmaster, the nation's largest live events ticket seller, was allowed to merge with Live Nation, the nation's largest events promoter. Despite promises that the merger would be good for consumers, the exact opposite has come true. Ticketmaster-Live Nation has squeezed customers for endless fees, stifled the marketplace, and crushed competition. Ticketmaster's refusal to issue full refunds during a pandemic fits within a broader pattern of abuse befitting of a monopoly that believes itself above scrutiny. Encountering a tidal wave of populist anger from customers on social media, the ticketing giant finally moved to reason. On April 17, Ticketmaster created a 30-day window for customers to receive refunds beginning May 1. Still facing backlash, this past week the window was extended to 60 days. Ticketmaster's policy reversal is a welcome start. But the company can and should go further to ensure that every single person is properly notified and able to receive a refund. We ask that Ticketmaster proactively contact consumers about refunds, using the personal data it collects for consumer accounts' such as cell phone numbers and emails to reach people. With rapidly changing circumstances, consumers are overwhelmed right now. That's why Congress acted to extend the tax filing deadline, and many retailers have extended the period for returns. Ticketmaster should give purchasers until one week before the scheduled event date to request a refund. And regardless of event cancelation or delay, any customer who wants a refund should receive it. Anything less than that is unacceptable and could be subject to even more attention from Congress. To be sure, COVID-19 has decimated the live event industry. As lawmakers, we will continue to fight for the small venues, stagehands, performers, struggling artists, and working people hurt by this public health crisis. But a major corporation like Ticketmaster should not hold customers' money hostage, especially during a pandemic. Americans have enough on their plates as it is.

Tested negative for coronavirus

Jan. 1, 1900

On March 25, 2020, Katie Porter self-quarantined for coronavirus after experiencing related symptoms. She announced that she tested negative two days later. Coronavirus pandemic Select a topic from the dropdown below to learn more.Political responses overviewState reopening plansDocumenting America's Path to RecoveryDaily updatesElection changesChanges to vote-by-mail and absentee voting proceduresFederal responsesState responsesState executive ordersStay-at-home ordersMultistate agreementsNon-governmental reopening plansEvictions and foreclosures policiesTravel restrictionsEnacted state legislationState legislative session changesSchool closuresState court closuresInmate releasesLocal government responsesDiagnosed or quarantined politiciansBallot measure changesArguments about government responsesThe 1918 influenza pandemicPandemic Response Accountability CommitteeUnemployment filingsLawsuitsSubmit COVID-19, also known as coronavirus disease 2019.

Events

2020