Share on WeChat
https://www.powervoter.us:443/dan_bishop
Copy the link and open WeChat to share.
 Share on WeChat
Copy the link and open WeChat to share.
 Share on WeChat
Scan QRCode using WeChat,and then click the icon at the top-right corner of your screen.
 Share on WeChat
Scan QRCode using WeChat,and then click the icon at the top-right corner of your screen.
Quick Facts
Personal Details

Caucuses/Former Committees

Former Member, Appropriations/Base Budget Committee, North Carolina State Senate

Former Co-Chair, Appropriations on Health and Human Services Committee, North Carolina State Senate

Former Vice Chair, Banking Committee, North Carolina State House of Representatives

Former Member, Commerce and Insurance Commerce, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Committee on Small Business, United States House of Representatives

Former Member, Energy and Public Utilities Committee, North Carolina State House of Representatives

Former Member, Environmental Review Commission, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Finance Committee, North Carolina State House of Representatives

Former Member, Finance Committee, North Carolina State Senate

Former Co-Chair, Health Care Committee, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Health Committee, North Carolina State House of Representatives

Former Member, Joint Legislative Commission of Energy Policy, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Joint Legislative Elections Oversight Committee, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Medicaid and North Carolina Health Choice, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Judiciary Committee, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Judiciary IV Committee, North Carolina State House of Representatives

Former Co-Chair, Legislative Ethics Committee, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Pensions and Retirement Committee, North Carolina State House of Representatives

Former Member, Public Utilities Committee, North Carolina State House of Representatives

Former Co-Chair, Redistricting and Elections Committee, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Regulatory Reform Committee, North Carolina State House of Representatives

Former Member, Revenue Law Study Committee, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Rules and Operations of the Senate, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Select Committee on Nominations, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Subcommittee on Appropriations, Health and Human Services, North Carolina State House of Representatives

Education

  • JD, Law, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1986-1990
  • BS, Business Administration, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1982-1986

Professional Experience

  • JD, Law, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1986-1990
  • BS, Business Administration, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1982-1986
  • Attorney, Erwin, Bishop, Capitano and Moss, Professional Association, 1996-present
  • Attorney, Robinson, Bradshaw and Hinson, 1990-1996

Political Experience

  • JD, Law, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1986-1990
  • BS, Business Administration, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1982-1986
  • Attorney, Erwin, Bishop, Capitano and Moss, Professional Association, 1996-present
  • Attorney, Robinson, Bradshaw and Hinson, 1990-1996
  • Representative, United States House of Representatives, North Carolina, District 9, 2019-present
  • Candidate, United States House of Representatives, North Carolina, District 9, 2019, 2020
  • Senator, North Carolina State Senate, District 39, 2017-2019
  • Candidate, North Carolina State Senate, District 39, 2018
  • Representative, North Carolina State House of Representatives, District 104, 2014-2017
  • Commissioner, Mecklenburg County, 2004-2008

Former Committees/Caucuses

Former Member, Appropriations/Base Budget Committee, North Carolina State Senate

Former Co-Chair, Appropriations on Health and Human Services Committee, North Carolina State Senate

Former Vice Chair, Banking Committee, North Carolina State House of Representatives

Former Member, Commerce and Insurance Commerce, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Energy and Public Utilities Committee, North Carolina State House of Representatives

Former Member, Environmental Review Commission, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Finance Committee, North Carolina State House of Representatives

Former Member, Finance Committee, North Carolina State Senate

Former Co-Chair, Health Care Committee, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Health Committee, North Carolina State House of Representatives

Former Member, Joint Legislative Commission of Energy Policy, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Joint Legislative Elections Oversight Committee, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Health and Human Services, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Joint Legislative Oversight Committee on Medicaid and North Carolina Health Choice, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Judiciary Committee, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Judiciary IV Committee, North Carolina State House of Representatives

Former Co-Chair, Legislative Ethics Committee, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Pensions and Retirement Committee, North Carolina State House of Representatives

Former Member, Public Utilities Committee, North Carolina State House of Representatives

Former Co-Chair, Redistricting and Elections Committee, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Regulatory Reform Committee, North Carolina State House of Representatives

Former Member, Revenue Law Study Committee, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Rules and Operations of the Senate, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Select Committee on Nominations, North Carolina State Senate

Former Member, Subcommittee on Appropriations, Health and Human Services, North Carolina State House of Representatives

Current Legislative Committees

Member, Committee on Homeland Security

Member, Committee on the Judiciary

Member, Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law

Member, Subcommittee on Border Security, Facilitation, and Operations

Member, Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet

Member, Subcommittee on Oversight, Management, and Accountability

Religious, Civic, and other Memberships

  • JD, Law, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1986-1990
  • BS, Business Administration, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1982-1986
  • Attorney, Erwin, Bishop, Capitano and Moss, Professional Association, 1996-present
  • Attorney, Robinson, Bradshaw and Hinson, 1990-1996
  • Representative, United States House of Representatives, North Carolina, District 9, 2019-present
  • Candidate, United States House of Representatives, North Carolina, District 9, 2019, 2020
  • Senator, North Carolina State Senate, District 39, 2017-2019
  • Candidate, North Carolina State Senate, District 39, 2018
  • Representative, North Carolina State House of Representatives, District 104, 2014-2017
  • Commissioner, Mecklenburg County, 2004-2008
  • Member, Sigma Chi Fraternity, 1986-present
  • Member, Providence United Methodist Church, present
  • Appointed by Governor McCrory, Member, Courts Commission
  • Member, United Service Organization of North Carolina Advisory Committee

Other Info

— Awards:

  • Ten times voted to Business North Carolina "Legal Elite." Seven times selected by "Super Lawyers." 2013-14 Best Lawyers.

  • 1 Dog: Ellie

Policy Positions

2021

Abortion

1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-life

Budget

1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- No

2. Do you support expanding federal funding to support entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare?
- Unknown Position

Campaign Finance

1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Unknown Position

Crime

Do you support the protection of government officials, including law enforcement officers, from personal liability in civil lawsuits concerning alleged misconduct?
- Unknown Position

Defense

Do you support increasing defense spending?
- Unknown Position

Economy

1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Unknown Position

2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Unknown Position

3. Do you support providing financial relief to businesses AND/OR corporations negatively impacted by the state of national emergency for COVID-19?
- Yes

Education

1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- Unknown Position

Energy and Environment

1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, geo-thermal)?
- Unknown Position

2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Unknown Position

Guns

1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- No

Health Care

1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- Unknown Position

2. Do you support requiring businesses to provide paid medical leave during public health crises, such as COVID-19?
- No

Immigration

1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- Yes

2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- Unknown Position

National Security

1. Should the United States use military force to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a weapon of mass destruction (for example: nuclear, biological, chemical)?
- Unknown Position

2. Do you support reducing military intervention in Middle East conflicts?
- Unknown Position

Trade

Do you generally support removing barriers to international trade (for example: tariffs, quotas, etc.)?
- Yes

2019

Abortion

1. Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
- Pro-life

Budget

1. In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
- No

2. In order to balance the budget, do you support reducing defense spending?
- Unknown Position

Campaign Finance

1. Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
- Unknown Position

Economy

1. Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Unknown Position

2. Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?
- Unknown Position

Education

1. Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?
- Unknown Position

Energy & Environment

1. Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, thermal)?
- Unknown Position

2. Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
- Unknown Position

Guns

1. Do you generally support gun-control legislation?
- No

Health Care

1. Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?
- Unknown Position

Immigration

1. Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?
- Yes

2. Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
- Unknown Position

Marijuana

Do you support the legalization of marijuana for recreational purposes?
- Unknown Position

National Security

1. Should the United States use military force in order to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a nuclear weapon?
- Unknown Position

2. Do you support increased American intervention in Middle Eastern conflicts beyond air support?
- Unknown Position

State Bills
Endorsements
Dan Bishop did not file to run for re-election.
Club for Growth
Mark Harris
Speeches
Articles

FOX News - Op-Ed: Democrats obsessed with impeachment, ignore border crisis

Nov. 8, 2019

By Mike Rogers, Rep. Adrian Smith, Rep. Tim Walberg, Rep. Ann Wagner, Rep. Ross Spano, Rep. Dan Bishop House Democrats are so obsessed with impeaching President Trump and trying to undermine the Trump administration that they are doing nothing to fix real problems Americans care about, like border security. In fact, House Democrats are so determined to undercut the president's agenda that they refuse to recognize the national security vulnerabilities on our southwest border. We saw these vulnerabilities firsthand as part of a trip last weekend to the Rio Grande Valley, the most trafficked part of the border. The Rio Grande Valley was at the heart of the spring migrant crisis, accounting for nearly half of the families and children law enforcement apprehended in the past year. To paint a fuller picture of how cartels, gangs and other bad actors are taking advantage of weaknesses in the Rio Grande Valley, here are a few recent examples. In only three days last week, law enforcement seized nearly 1,000 pounds of marijuana worth over a quarter-million dollars. In a five-day period last week, agents interdicted more than $3 million worth of cocaine. Border Patrol agents arrested known members of the MS-13 and the 18th Street Gang in the sector earlier this fall. The area is also a hotbed for human smuggling. Last month, agents stopped four separate smuggling attempts, catching a total of 28 illegal immigrants, including five Chinese nationals. These are only examples of what law enforcement was able to accomplish. Securing the Rio Grande Valley is one of President Trump's top priorities. Fortunately, we're making progress in achieving that goal. The administration is in the process of building more than 100 miles of a border wall system in the region, updating inadequate barriers and filling gaps in existing wall -- all making it harder to cross undetected. Our group was among the first people to see new construction in areas where no wall existed before. This new wall is made of steel bollards filled with concrete and designed to make it extremely difficult to defeat. It's also equipped with sensors and cameras. Additionally, the administration is building a levee wall system in floodplains to stop illegal traffic and help manage flooding. We know that walls work. Illegal traffic has dropped at least 90 percent in San Diego, El Paso, Tucson and Yuma since wall went up in the 1990s and 2000s. In addition, agents and operators in the field -- as well as Department of Homeland Security leadership -- have consistently told Congress that building walls is a crucial part of securing the border. We also visited facilities that housed a record number of migrant families and children who arrived at our border this year. We saw the Rio Grande Valley Centralized Processing Center, which was designed in 2014 with this demographic shift in mind. This facility is much larger than Border Patrol station facilities. It was staffed with personnel trained to care for children and stocked with necessary supplies like snacks, children's clothing and diaper-changing stations. Thankfully, President Trump and his administration have acted to stem the flow of migrants that overwhelmed these facilities and drained resources and personnel from across the department. The administration secured critical agreements with Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador to improve security cooperation across the region and reduce exploitation of our immigration laws. While the administration has successfully reduced border apprehensions in recent months, we are still stuck working with a broken system that only Congress can fix. On the border, we heard time and time again from law enforcement that legislative fixes are needed to improve border security and stop the exploitation of our immigration laws. Regrettably, House Democrats have no interest in closing loopholes that smugglers, criminals, and cartels are abusing at the expense of vulnerable children and families. On top of that, government funding talks have stalled over Democratic opposition to future border wall funding. Border security and closing immigration loopholes used to be bipartisan priorities. Even President Barack Obama supported securing the border. In fact, the Obama administration bragged about its efforts to crack down on illegal border crossings. In 2014, Obama said: "Our message is absolutely don't send your children … on trains or through a bunch of smugglers. That is our direct message to families in Central America … if they do make it, they'll get sent back." The only thing that has changed is that President Trump was elected on a pledge to secure the border. Now, instead of working on a bipartisan basis to both secure the border and prevent a humanitarian crisis from happening again, House Democrats are focusing all their energy on trying to impeach the president. It's shameful that they are putting a partisan exercise over our national security.

North Carolina Special Election Tests Trump, 2020 Republican Prospects

Sep. 10, 2019

HAVELOCK, N.C. (AP) — Trying to prove his political clout by pushing a Republican to victory in a special election , President Donald Trump used a North Carolina rally to paint a bleak picture of a nation he claimed would be overrun with crime, poverty and immigrants if Democrats seize power in Washington. Trump, appearing Monday at his first campaign rally in nearly a month, went on the offensive in an effort to change a series of late-summer negative headlines over his slipping poll numbers, warning signs of an economic slowdown and a running battle over hurricane forecasts. He urged the Fayetteville crowd to vote for Republican Dan Bishop on Tuesday, brandishing his usual incendiary rhetoric to declare from the stage that “tomorrow is a chance to send a clear message to the America-hating left.” Should Bishop defeat Democrat Dan McCready, it could give Trump room to assert that he pulled Bishop over the top. If McCready prevails or Bishop wins by a whisker, it will suggest GOP erosion and raise questions about Trump’s and his party’s viability for 2020. Shortly after Trump’s rally, McCready launched a late fund-raising appeal, saying Trump and his allies “scheduled this rally to rile up support for my opponent and increase Republican turnout....The GOP is terrified of losing this race.” While the stakes for the House are high, Trump’s trademark rallies inevitably become more about him than the local candidate, as he uses the stage to settle political scores, sharpen attacks and take on perceived foes. With an eye to his own reelection next fall, he touted his administration’s accomplishments but also urged voters to give him more time. “That’s why we need four more years,” Trump said at the nearly 90-minute rally. “It’s got to seed — it’s a plant. It has to grow. It has to grow those roots. That’s why 2020 is just as important. Because they will try to take it away.” Trump’s appearance Monday emerged as a test of the Republican president’s pull with voters. The special election could offer clues about the mindset of Republicans in the suburbs, whose flight from the party fueled the GOP’s 2018 House election losses. The president enjoys wide popularity within his own party, but a GOP defeat in a red-leaning state could portend trouble for his reelection campaign. But before leaving Washington, Trump dismissed questions of whether a poor result for the Republican candidate would serve as a warning sign in next year’s elections. “No, I don’t see it as a bellwether,” Trump said. After a light rally schedule of late, the president had plenty of new material to work with. Chief among them was the White House’s worries about the impact an economic downturn could have on a president who has made a strong economy his central argument for a second term. Trump advisers worry that moderate Republican and independent voters who have been willing to give him a pass on some of his incendiary policies and rhetoric would blame him — and, in particular, his trade war with China — for slowing down the economy. Trump offered up a robust defense of the trade war with Beijing. He pushed for Congress to approve his new U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade deal. And he exaggerated the number of miles constructed on his promised border wall. Monday’s rally was held just over 100 miles (160 kilometers) from the site of a Trump rally in July where “send her back” chants aimed at a Somali-born American congresswoman rattled the Republican Party and seemed to presage an ugly reelection campaign. The chant was not heard Monday. Instead, Trump repeatedly painted the Democrats as a party that has moved to the extreme left on issues like immigration, abortion and health care. “You don’t have any choice. You have to vote for me,” Trump told the crowd. “What are you going to do: Put one of these crazy people running? They are so far left.” “Your way of life is under assault by these people,” he claimed. Trump also expressed his support for the Second Amendment against the backdrop of a recent spate of deadly mass shootings across the country. It comes as congressional Democrats push for expanded background checks for gun purchases and as Trump has flip-flopped on the issue amid pressure from the National Rifle Association. In the hours before the rally, Trump flew to coastal North Carolina to inspect the damage left by Hurricane Dorian, but bad weather forced officials to scrap those plans. Instead, he received a briefing on Air Force One, where Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper told him three deaths are connected to the storm and some 3,500 people are without power. Many of the president’s comments about the storm have been defending his erroneous claim that Alabama was likely to face significant impact from it. Trump did not mention the matter at Monday’s rally. The House district flows eastward from the prosperous Charlotte suburbs into rural areas hugging the South Carolina border. State officials invalidated last November’s election following allegations of voter fraud by a GOP operative. The district has been held by the GOP since 1963. In 2016, Trump won the district by 11 percentage points. “This will tell us if Trump can carry candidates through suburban districts or not,” said Sarah Chamberlain, president of the Republican Main Street Partnership, which represents moderate Republicans. If not, she said, the GOP must “work harder to address the concerns of suburban individuals, mainly women.” Marshville residents Philip and Diane Ezzell, both 70, were near the front of the line Monday waiting to enter the Trump rally. Both attributed their support for Bishop to his backing by Trump. “We like his values, and he supports Trump,” Diane Ezzell said. “And we don’t want no socialist clowns.” That was a reference to a TV spot by Bishop superimposing the faces of McCready and other prominent Democrats on swaying clown figures. Cynthia Brown, of Fayetteville, 50, is also attending the rally. Brown, who is black, said supporting Trump has been “a pretty lonely experience” for her. She added: “But that’s OK. I’m not a follower.” ___ Associated Press writer Kevin Freking contributed to this report from Washington. Source: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/

Electoral vote certification on January 6-7, 2021

Jan. 1, 1900

Congress convened a joint session on January 6-7, 2021, to count electoral votes by state and confirm the results of the 2020 presidential election. Bishop voted against certifying the electoral votes from Arizona and Pennsylvania. The House rejected both objections by a vote of 121-303 for Arizona and 138-282 for Pennsylvania.

Events

2020

Oct. 10
Mecklenburg County Day of Action

Sat 8:00 AM – 3:00 PM EDT

Mecklenburg County, North Carolina