Download the FREE TrendingPolitics App so you never miss a Trump story

During the Senate impeachment trial on Thursday, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts censored Republican Senator Rand Paul when he blocked him from asking a question.

Paul's question had to do with the "anonymous" whistleblower who was responsible for sparking the impeachment of President Trump.

"My question today is about whether or not individuals who were holdovers from the Obama National Security Council and Democrat partisans conspired with Schiff staffers to plot impeaching the President before there were formal House impeachment proceedings," Paul tweeted.

The Senator then fired back at Roberts by tweeting the question that Roberts censored: “My exact question was: Are you aware that House intelligence committee staffer Shawn Misko had a close relationship with Eric Ciaramella while at the National Security Council together and are you aware and how do you respond to reports that Ciaramella and Misko may have worked together to plot impeaching the President before there were formal house impeachment proceedings.”

Paul went on: “My question is not about a ‘whistleblower’ as I have no independent information on his identity. My question is about the actions of known Obama partisans within the NSC and House staff and how they are reported to have conspired before impeachment proceedings had even begun.”

WATCH:
 

Paul is clearly tired of the ongoing impeachment sham which is why he is going on the offensive. On Tuesday, Paul went off on Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer when he suggested that President Trump should sue the minority leader for defamation.

“You know, I’m offended and shocked that Schumer would be so scurrilous as to accuse the president and his children of making money illegally off of politics when the only people we know have made money off of this have been Hunter Biden and Joe Biden,” Paul said.

“So Hunter Biden makes a million dollars a year, that’s documented, but Schumer simply creates and makes up and says, ‘Oh, maybe the president’s kids are making money.’ John Bolton is making money as we speak," he added. "He has probably already gotten the several million dollar advance for this book. He’s making money by testifying against the president.”

“The only people we know who have actually made money? Hunter Biden and now John Bolton. And they’re not objective–John Bolton is not objective in any way now that he’s cashing million dollar checks," Paul continued. "To have Schumer come up and say out of the blue, ‘Maybe the president’s kids are making money,’ with no evidence at all, that’s defamation and they ought to sue him.”

Schumer did in fact suggest that President Trump's children were making money overseas with no evidence.

**Piss Off Democrats With Your FREE Betsy Ross Flag***

“There is nothing in the record about the president’s kids,” Paul said. “So Schumer has just created this whole thing out of whole cloth and said, ‘Oh, why don’t we go after the president’s kids?’ We don’t know yet whether or not the president’s dealings with the Chinese president have something to do with the Trumps making money.’ He just made it up! Completely made it up! That’s defamation of character and he ought to go to court and be sued for it.”

WATCH the clip below:

What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below!